Legal Opinion

Capeon v. Hitchcock

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1893No. 19092PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vakclief, C.

— Action to enforce the lien of an assessment on the lot of defendants in the city of San Diego, for street work, alleged to have been done by plaintiff under a contract awarded to him by the city council and executed on the part of the city by the superintendent of streets. The complaint is in the usual form.

The answer, after denying the alleged contract, averred, and the court found: “ That, at all the times mentioned in plaintiff’s complaint, the city of San Diego was a municipal corporation of the fourth class, organized and existing under an act of the legislature of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Inre Yick WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Christy v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Dougherty v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thomson v. CallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Independent School District No. 5 ex rel. Moore v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Rowe v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Tallman v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API