Brandenstein v. Jackling
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
— Plaintiffs recovered judgment for $15,680 for breach of warranty of quality made in the sale of rice, together with interest from the commencement of this action. Defendants appeal, claiming chiefly that there was no warranty made in the sale.
The contract of sale and warranty upon which the judgment appealed from is based, was made between two San Francisco merchants for the sale and purchase of rice to be shipped from the Orient to Cuba and is in its essential parts as follows:
“San Francisco, March 9, 1920.
“Pacific Rice Mills hereby agrees to sell and M. J. Branden-stein and Company, San…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Miller v. Germain Seed & Plant Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- California Sugar & White Pine Agency v. PenoyarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Polhemus v. HeimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Straus v. North Hollywood Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- India Paint and Lacquer Co. v. United Steel Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- El Zarape Tortilla Factory, Inc. v. Plant Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.