Chase v. City Treasurer of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order dissolving an injunction. J. W. McKinley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. C. W. Chase, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This action was brought to restrain the city treasurer of Los Angeles from selling the real property of plaintiff to pay the amount claimed to be due by defendant Sheldon on a bond issued against said property under the provisions of the act of March 17, 1891 (Stats. 1891, p. 116), for work on Ohio street in said city, which work was done under the provisions of the so-called Yrooman act of March 18, 1885. (Stats. 1885, p. 147.) A perpetual injunction was prayed for, and that said bond and assessment be declared to be void so far as they affect plaintiff’s property.
The court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Hewes v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Green v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Spencer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Imperial Land Co. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.California Supreme Court · 1916
- McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Stanwood v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.