Legal Opinion

O'Bryan v. Mengel Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 1, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of contract. It was instituted May 15,1924, in the Jefferson 'Circuit court, by P. M. 0 ’Bryan and B. J. 0 ’Bryan, partmers, trading as 0 ’Bryan Bros., ag'ainst the Mengel Company, to recover $3,993.46 damages, with interest from October 1, 1937, for the breach of a written contract entered into by the parties on October 1,1916. The written contract, as reformed by an agreed judgment, obligated the plaintiffs to buy and the defendant to sell all the boxes required by plaintiffs in their business for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  4. McLaughlin v. KnoblochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McDonald v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Koppers Co. v. Asher Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Wilson v. Corrugated Kraft Containers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Bennett v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
  5. Hall v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API