Legal Opinion

Winnebago State Bank v. Hall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1927No. 17622PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY. 0.

This action was com-meilced by the Winnebago State Bank of Winnebago. Ill., herein called plaintiff, against William F, Hall H. B. Pearson, Elizabeth B. Pearson, his wife, and the Texas Company, defendants, on November 5, 1923, in the district court of Rogers county, for a judgment decreeing the amount due on a promissory note, and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage given to secure said note, and covering the following described land, to wit:

The W.¾ of the N. E.1/4 of the N. W.14 and the N. W.¾ of the S. E.~4 of the N. W. 14 of section 5, township 22 north, range 15 east of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McBlair v. GibbesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. Gilkey-Duff Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Yahola Oil Co. v. CauseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Noble v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Whitney v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. DrabekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API