Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Okla.. T. Error from, District.¡Court, Comanche County. Action by the Citizens5 National Bank of Chickasha against E. F. Mitchell and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brought error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma, whence the cause was transferred to the I Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma.
Read the full summary
Okla.. T. Error from, District.¡Court, Comanche County. Action by the Citizens5 National Bank of Chickasha against E. F. Mitchell and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brought error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma, whence the cause was transferred to the I Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. On the 11th day of February, 1905, ¿the plaintiff in error, the Citizens5 National Bank of Chickasha, as plaintiff, begain its action in the district court of Comanche'county, territory of Oklahoma, .against the defendants in error, E. F. Mitchell, City National Bank of…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The following questions are raised in this record:(1) Did the contract entered into by and between E. F. Mitchell and Arthur Coleman, on July 2, 1901, constitute a partnership between them?(2) Was said contract against public policy, and therefore' void ?(3) Although said contract may have been void as against public policy, the same having been carried out and executed with the exception of a final accounting between the parties, will one party thereto, under the facts of the case, be compelled to contribute to the other his share of the profits?(4) Was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Armstrong v. American Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Coppell v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Champlin v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Honnold v. Brd. of Com'rs Carter Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Market Nat. Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio v. RaspberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Walters Nat. Bank v. BantockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.