Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & Tyner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Custer County; J. W. Lawler, Judge. Action by Lamb & Tyner against the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
Throughout this opinion, plaintiff in error will be referred to as “defendant,” and defendants in error as “plaintiffs.”
This action originated before E. C. Ballew, a justice of the peace' at Clinton in Custer county, and was brought by plaintiffs to recover upon an open account for medical services rendered to one Bill Lindley, an employee of defendant, in treating a gunshot wound received by said employee in a personal encounter with a trespasser upon defendant’s premises. The justice court gave judgment for plaintiffs, from which defendant appealed to the county court of Custer county,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Guthrie National Bank v. GuthrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Waterman v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Board of Commissioners v. AlbrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. Grayson CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. District Court of Mayes CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Jack v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Herndon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.