Legal Opinion

Chase v. Commerce Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1923No. 14260PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error from District Court, Bryan County; Geo. S. Miareh, Judge. Action by the Commerce Trust Company againsit Jim Osiborne and others!. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant ' Frank H. Chase brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action by the Commerce Trust Company, as plaintiff, against Jim Osborne, Nora Osborne, J. C. Walden, and Frank H. Chase, as defendants, to recover upon a promissory note, and for the foreclosure of a mortgage securing the same, executed by Jim Osborne and Nora Osborne, his wife, to the plaintiff, and covering certain lands in Bryan county. The only controversy presented here is that between the plaintiff and the defendant Frank H. Chase.

The facts, briefly stated, are that on April 2, 1917, J. M. Finch and Vader Finch, his wife, executed and delivered to Aurelius-Swanson Company…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Curtis v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Watson v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Adams v. NashvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Hollinshead v. John Stuart & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. CPT Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2004-EC1 v. Cin KhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Bale v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Cogswell v. CannadySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API