Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. Drabek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA Justice.
Our answer to a single question is dispositive of this appeal. When issuing its temporary injunction, 1 did the trial court decide issues that lay beyond its jurisdiction? We answer in the affirmative. The interlocutory order, from which V.J. Drabek [Drabek] brought this appeal, is void on the face of the judgment roll 2 insofar as (1) it affects the conduct of J.E. DePlanche (Drabek’s wife) and (2) implicitly decides her rights as holder of the dominant estate in the land in which Chickasaw Telephone Company’s [company] claims the contested easement. The nisi pri-us order may…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cate v. Archon Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Woods Petroleum Corp. v. SledgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Pointer v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Lincoln Bank & Trust Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herbst v. SayreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma, Inc. v. AguirreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. ASHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Barnthouse v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.