Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kornman

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 29, 2005No. 3:04CV1803-LPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LINDSAY, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendant Gary M. Kornman’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b), filed November 8, 2004 and Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s Motion to Strike, filed January 18, 2005. After careful consideration of the motions, responses, replies and applicable authority, the court denies Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint and denies as moot Plaintiffs Motion to Strike.

I. Procedural and Factual Background

For purposes of Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the court assumes all facts alleged…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. SteffesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Quaak v. Dexia, S.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. McGeeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CubanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
  5. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TalbotDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API