Legal Opinion

Quaak v. Dexia, S.A.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided August 8, 2006No. Civil Action 03-11566-PBSPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, United States District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Class plaintiffs bring claims for securities fraud against Dexia Bank Belgium (“Dexia”), the successor to Artesia Banking Corp., S.A. (“Artesia Banking”), the former chief commercial banker for Lern-out & Hauspie Speech Products N.V. (“L & H”). Defendant Dexia moves to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) on grounds that the amendments to the complaint are time-barred and fail to state claims under the securities laws. After hearing and review of the briefs, the motion is DENIED.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & Erisa Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  2. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative &" ERISA" LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  3. Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank AgDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. Idaho Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Badio v. G4s Solution USADistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API