Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. McGee

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2012No. Civil Action No. 12-1296PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SAVAGE, District Judge.

In this securities fraud action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) based upon a misappropriation theory of liability under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 19341 and SEC Rule 10b-5,2 defendants Timothy McGee, Michael Zirinsky and Robert Zirinsky have moved to dismiss the complaint. They contend that the complaint does not sufficiently allege the existence of a relationship of trust and confidence, an essential element of an insider trading cause of action under the misappropriation theory. As he did in his motion to…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Abbvie Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  3. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. All Know Holdings, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. United States v. McGeeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Emerson v. Capital One, NADistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API