Legal Opinion
Mix v. Tumanjan Development Corporation
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 2002No. B143328PublishedCited by 14 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, Acting P. J.
In the published portion of this opinion, we hold
that an attorney representing himself or herself, who prevails in an action on a contract with an attorney fee provision, may recover reasonable attorney fees incurred for legal services of other attorneys who assist the pro se attorney in the prosecution or defense of the action, even if the assisting attorneys do not appear as attorneys of record in the action. We conclude the trial court properly awarded attorney fees. In the unpublished portion of this opinion we conclude substantial evidence supports the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Dowling v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Garfield Bank v. FolbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ramona Unified School District v. TsiknasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Carpenter & Zuckerman, LLP v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Witte v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Ellis Law Group, LLP v. Nevada City Sugar Loaf Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.