Legal Opinion

Trope v. Katz

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1995No. S043227PublishedCited by 291 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In this appeal we consider whether an attorney who chooses to litigate in propria persona rather than retain another attorney to represent him in an action to enforce a contract containing an attorney fee provision can nevertheless recover “reasonable attorney’s fees” under Civil Code section 1717 (hereafter section 1717) as compensation for the time and effort expended and the professional business opportunities lost as a result. We shall conclude that such an attorney litigant cannot recover such fees under section 1717, and hence that the judgment of the Court of Appeal so…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by291 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API