Legal Opinion

Garfield Bank v. Folb

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1994No. B074843PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.—

Statement of Facts

This appeal is from an order after judgment awarding attorney fees and costs to defendant Stanley Folb (Folb) and against plaintiff Garfield Bank (Garfield). The underlying case was tried before Judge Alfred L. Margolis, judge of the superior court (retired), sitting on stipulation of both parties.

In its second amended complaint, the operative complaint, Garfield alleged causes of action for declaratory relief, breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and constructive fraud. Garfield sought damages, costs, attorney fees and declaratory…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Mix v. Tumanjan Development CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API