Legal Opinion

Dowling v. Zimmerman

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 2001No. D032128, D032824PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.

Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 425.16 is California’s antiSLAPP suit (strategic lawsuits against public participation) statute (hereafter referred to as section 425.16 or the anti-SLAPP statute). 2 The anti-SLAPP statute was specifically enacted to provide both a summary disposition and attorney fees and costs to defendants in such actions. 3

Plaintiff and appellant Peter Dowling (Dowling) appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint against defendant and respondent Connie Zimmerman (Zimmerman) under the provisions of section 425.16, and awarding her, under subdivision…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Gilbert v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API