PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
We granted review in this matter to address the question whether an entity that is represented by in-house counsel may recover attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717. As will appear, the answer is yes. Like private counsel, in-house counsel stand in an attorney-client relationship with the corporation and provide comparable legal services. In the case of such representation, the trial court retains broad discretion under Civil Code section 1717 to fix an award of attorney fees in a reasonable amount. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
I
Defendant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by426 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Graciano v. Robinson Ford Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
421 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.