Legal Opinion

Ramona Unified School District v. Tsiknas

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 2005No. D044663PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

Plaintiff Ramona Unified School District (RUSD) sought to construct a school (the project) and, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), issued a mitigated negative declaration (MND) when it approved the project. However, when RUSD subsequently proposed a potential alteration to the project, defendant Neighborhood Alliance for Safe Ramona Schools (NASRS) filed a writ petition alleging RUSD’s proposal violated CEQA, and sought an order setting aside the proposed change to the MND and requiring RUSD to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) on…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Salma v. CaponCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Hylton v. Frank E. Rogozienski, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Paiva v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API