Legal Opinion

Carpenter & Zuckerman, LLP v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2011No. B215544PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

The trial court, in granting defendants’ request to strike plaintiffs’ memorandum of costs seeking attorney fees incurred as the prevailing parties in a prior appeal, concluded that a law firm and its two partners, by using an associate in the law firm, had, in effect, represented themselves in the prior appeal. In this appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in granting the motion to tax costs because the attorney who represented them on appeal was not a partner and otherwise had no financial interest in their law firm. Also, plaintiffs contend that,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bently Reserve LP v. PapalioliosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Prigmore v. City of ReddingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Jsj Limited Partnership v. MehrbanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Soni v. Wellmike Enterprise Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Sands & Associates v. JuknavorianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API