Legal Opinion

Manufacturers Supply Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 7, 1988No. G85-960 CA1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HILLMAN, Chief Judge.

On September 30, 987, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s four count complaint. With respect to count IV, defendant also argued that the complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The court heard oral argument on March 24, 1988. At that time the parties agreed to drop the tortious interference claim (count III) and I granted defendant’s motion with respect to plaintiff’s breach of contract claim (count I). Plaintiff requested an opportunity to file additional…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Aurora Cable Communications, Inc. v. Jones Intercable, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. General Aviation, Inc. v. Garrett Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API