Legal Opinion

Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 2010No. Civil Action 04-5898PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STENGEL, District Judge.

In an order dated November 3, 2009, this Court granted in part and denied in part a motion filed by GlaxoSmithKline, et al (“GSK”) for judgment on the pleadings, seeking dismissal of the end-payor plaintiffs’ amended class action complaint. Plaintiffs, indirect purchasers of Wellbutrin SR, were granted leave to amend their complaint a second time to assert causes of action in those states where they purchased or into which they sent reimbursements for Wellbutrin SR. GSK has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, which asserts causes of…

2Cases cited142 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  5. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API