General Aviation, Inc. v. Garrett Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILES, Senior District Judge.
Now before the Court are the motions of the defendants, The Garrett Corporation and The Cessna Aircraft Company, for summary judgment on plaintiff General Aviation, Inc.’s three-count amended complaint. This action asserts violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 1, and the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act, Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. section 445.772, against both defendants. In addition, the plaintiff asserts a tortious interference claim (labelled “loss of financial expectancy” in the first amended…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mahaffey v. Detroit Newspaper AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997