Aurora Cable Communications, Inc. v. Jones Intercable, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
Tribune Company, Inc., successor in interest to defendant Tribune Cable Communications, Inc. (“Tribune”) and Jones Inter-cable, Inc., and Cable TV Fund 12-BCD Venture, (“Jones”) moves for partial summary judgment on the four counts of Aurora’s complaint.
BACKGROUND
Aurora brought this action after it failed to successfully establish a second, “overbuild,” cable television system in the cities of Houghton and Hancock intending to compete with Tribune. Tribune had served the area for about twenty years and it is contended its technology had become…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Classic Communications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996