Legal Opinion

Ruby v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1988No. 87-2018PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether the Rubys are entitled to recover under the underinsured motorist provisions of their Family Car Policy with Midwestern. The court of appeals held that they were not so entitled, finding that under the policy Midwestern’s liability limit was completely offset by payments received by the Rubys. While the court did not rule on Midwestern’s rights of subrogation, the parties have presented the issue for our review and it is within our discretion to sua sponte consider their respective claims. In this regard, we express no opinion as to whether the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Frey v. Independence Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vogt v. SchroederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Paape v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. Heller v. Standard Accident Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Csx Transportation, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  4. Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp. v. Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. The Ltv Corporation v. Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API