Legal Opinion

Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp. v. Employers Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 98-2456PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

Today we are asked to decide whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s granting of the appellees’ joint motion for summary judgement due to Ormet’s unreasonably late notice to its insurance carriers. We find no error and therefore we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*300Pursuant to Civ.R. 56, summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, written admissions, affidavits, transcripts of evidence, and written stipulations of fact, if any, timely filed in the action, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ruby v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Heller v. Standard Accident Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. PCB Contamination Insurance Coverage LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hoffman v. Gallia Cnty. Sheriff's OfficeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp. v. Employers Ins. of WausauOhio Supreme Court · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API