Legal Opinion

Alcazar v. Hayes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1998No. 03S01-9804-CV-00035PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This suit arose from a motor vehicle accident in which plaintiff David Alcazar was injured. Alcazar appeals from the Court of Appeal’s affirmance of the trial court’s award of summary judgment to defendant Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEI-CO”). The sole issue for our determination is whether an insurance policy is automatically forfeited when the insured does not comply with the policy’s notice provision, regardless of whether the insurer has been prejudiced by the delay. For the reasons stated hereinafter, we reverse the judgments of the lower courts and…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Brakeman v. Potomac Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. GomezTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Naifeh v. Valley Forge Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2006

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API