Legal Opinion

Bogan v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1988No. 86-1696PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

Upon a review of the policy terms before us, particularly those relied upon by the parties and which are set forth in their letters of correspondence, it becomes apparent that the issues in this case cannot be resolved without determining the effectiveness of those preconditions to underinsured motorist coverage contained in Progressive’s policy. Specifically, we must consider the consent to settlement clause, the extent to which an injured party must exhaust the underinsured’s policy limits and the extent to which the provider of underinsured motorist coverage may require protection of its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shealy v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Centennial Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. ShuffOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Federal Union Life Ins. v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Ferrando v. Auto-Owners Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. McDonald v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kurent v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API