Legal Opinion

Heller v. Standard Accident Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928No. 20584PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

In the trial court the plaintiff attached to his petition a copy of the policy, but did not allege performance of “all the conditions on his part to be performed.” The petition was therefore demurrable; but since the cause proceeded to trial, upon the issue of performance, error cannot be predicated upon such defective pleading. Union Ins. Co. of Dayton v. McGookey, 33 Ohio St., 555.

The real issue in the case, that of giving immediate notice by the assured, was specifically pleaded in the second defense of the insurance company’s answer. It set forth the condition in the policy which required…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Woodmen Accident Ass'n v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Parker v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Houran, Admr. v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Ruby v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Unverzagt v. PresteraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp. v. Employers InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API