Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Schroeder

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1986No. 84-1117PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court for Washington county accepted by this court upon the certification of the court of appeals.

The question in this case is whether an underin-surer has a right of subrogation against an underin-sured tortfeasor when the underinsurer makes a partial payment of its insured's damages. We conclude that it has the right of subrogation; and therefore, with modification, we affirm the circuit court order.

The issue arises out of the following facts. The plaintiff, Hubert W. Vogt (the insured), a passenger in his own…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Great Northern Oil Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. McDonald v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API