Legal Opinion

Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1913No. 10773PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered March 19, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon a redelivery bond. ■

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Hallidie Machinery Company, seeks recovery from the defendants, Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Company, as principal, and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, as surety, upon a redelivery bond executed by them in an action prosecuted by the machinery company against the sand and gravel company under the claim and delivery statutes. The plaintiff rests its right to recover upon the alleged failure of the sand and gravel company to return the property to the plaintiff in compliance with the conditions of the redelivery bond and judgment rendered in that action in its favor.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Capital Lumbering Co. v. LearnedOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Eickhoff v. EikenbaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. John Donnelly & Sons v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Caldwell v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Henry v. Bruhn & Henry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API