Legal Opinion

Eickhoff v. Eikenbary

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1897No. 7421PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

This was an action by Eikenbary against the plaintiffs in error on a replevin bond. Eikenbary was sheriff of Cass county and had seized the contents of a lumber yard on writs of attachment. James W. Williams replevied the property, Eikenbary and Wendt executing the bond as sureties. Pending the action Williams died. There was a revivor in the name of his executrix. The estate of Williams proceeded to settlement and on September 18, 1890, the executrix was discharged. Judgment was rendered in the replevin suit October 20, 1890, in favor of the defendant. The case was brought to this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Burr v. BoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Smith v. MasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Dillon v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Romero v. HopewellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. County of Platte v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  4. Weems v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  5. Saint James Apt. Partners v. Univeral Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2024

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API