Legal Opinion

Kunz v. Nelson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1938No. 5912PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in pursuance of a jury verdict for damages found due because of the claimed withholding by defendants of the plaintiff lessee’s share of certain crops. By a lease, dated April 11,1936, Ella F. Nelson leased to R. L. and Morris Q. Kunz her farm containing between sixty and seventy acres. Then follows a specific description, after which comes the following language :

“This lease does not include the pasture land in the bottoms nor the lot on which the house stands; neither are any building-, silos nor grounds around buildings or silos…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Allen v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Swartwout v. Michigan Air Line RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Washington Ice Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Fry v. SheheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  5. Fitzhugh v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alum Torres v. Campos del ToroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  2. McFaddin v. H. S. Crocker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Brook v. James A. Cullimore & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Building Concepts, Ltd. v. PickeringIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. HancockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API