Henry v. Bruhn & Henry, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered July 10,1919, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action to recover the possession of leased premises, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
The respondent held a lease upon property owned by the appellants for the “term of five years from February 2nd, 1914, . . . with the *322right to renew this lease for another five years at the same rental as for the first term of five years.” The appellants, two weeks after the end of the first term of five years, began this action to recover possession of the property, alleging that the lease had expired. By affirmative answer, the respondent plead that, prior to the expiration of the first term of five years, the respondent had elected to renew the lease for an additional five-year term, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crenshaw-Gary Lumber Co. v. NortonMississippi Supreme Court · 1916
- Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Erickson v. F. McLellan & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Glesener v. BalholmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Salzer v. ManfrediWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Basler v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Henry v. Bruhn & Henry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Peterson v. Granger Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.