Legal Opinion

Hallidie Machinery Co. v. Whidbey Island Sand & Gravel Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1911No. 9312PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Kellogg and Hardin, JJ., entered June 28, 1910, upon findings favorable to the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This action was commenced in the superior court by the plaintiff to recover possession from the defendant pf a certain gravel hoisting plant, which was delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant under a conditional sale contract entered into between them on September 28, 1908. This contract was partly printed and partly typewritten, and was in the form of a proposal made by the plaintiff to the defendant and accepted by the latter. The proposal was made upon what appears to be a general printed form, which will account for the peculiarity of its language when comparing the printed portions…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. San Christina Investment Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Edwards v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State ex rel. Washington Paving Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State Ex. Rel. Wash. Nav. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API