Legal Opinion

State v. Belzons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. DCR9411265; CA A85212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

In district court, defendant entered a plea of no contest and was convicted of menacing, a class A misdemeanor. ORS 163.190. He was placed on probation for two years. On the basis of our original opinion in State v. Rudder, 133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367, adhered to on recon 137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995), rev allowed State v. Rudder/Webb, 322 Or 489, 909 P2d 161 (1996), he argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction to enter any judgment and that his conviction therefore must be reversed.

Because defendant pled no contest, he

“may only take an appeal from a judgment * * * where the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. City of Lowell v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Calahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API