Legal Opinion

State v. Rudder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1995No. 93NB1223; CA A82625; DCR93-13043; CA A83199PublishedCited by 20 opinions

(Cases Consolidated for Opinion Only)

1Opinion of the Court

*46De MUNIZ, J.

The state moves for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Rudder, 133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367 (1995), on the ground that there has been a change in the statutes since our decision. ORAP 6.25(d). We allow reconsideration. The state requested oral argument on its motion for reconsideration. Defendant Rudder and defendant Webb then requested that State v. Webb be consolidated with Rudder. We consolidate the cases for opinion.

Rudder was before us on the state’s appeal from a pretrial order granting Rudder’s motion to dismiss the accusatory instrument charging him with menacing,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. LawlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Fox v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. JackmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API