Legal Opinion

State v. Stubbs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. 20-00-11795; A120041PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an amended judgment in a criminal proceeding, challenging the trial court’s alteration of his sentence. The state filed a motion to determine whether this court has jurisdiction over the appeal. ORS 19.235(3); ORAP 2.34(2). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that defendant’s appeal may proceed.

Defendant pleaded guilty pursuant to a stipulated sentencing agreement to one count of criminally negligent homicide, one count of felony failure to perform the duties of a driver, and one count of tampering with physical evidence. In its original judgment, on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Liberty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API