Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 10, 1992No. P196211; CA A67101PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*418ROSSMAN, J.

Defendant pled guilty to DUII. ORS 813.010. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed him on probation. One of the conditions of probation requires him to pay $200 in restitution. Defendant objected on the ground that there was no evidence in the record to support that or any other figure. The trial court entered a sentencing order, including restitution of $200. We vacate the order of restitution and remand for resentencing.

Because defendant pled guilty, his appeal is governed by ORS 138.050 and 138.053, which limit our review to whether the disposition either…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  4. State v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. BlaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. PendergraphtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. SumerlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. BranamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API