Legal Opinion

State v. Cruz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1999No. T95124761; CA A99647PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Following a guilty plea, defendant was convicted of the misdemeanor of giving false information to a police officer. ORS 162.385. On appeal, he contends that the case should have proceeded as a violation, rather than as a misdemeanor, because the prosecutor failed to comply with the requirements of former ORS 161.565(2). Under that statute, the prosecutor at arraignment must declare whether a misdemeanor charge will be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or as a violation. If the declaration is not made, the case must proceed as a violation. State v. Bonnin, 144 Or App 263, 926 P2d 830 (1996).

We do…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. BelzonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API