State v. Cruz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Following a guilty plea, defendant was convicted of the misdemeanor of giving false information to a police officer. ORS 162.385. On appeal, he contends that the case should have proceeded as a violation, rather than as a misdemeanor, because the prosecutor failed to comply with the requirements of former ORS 161.565(2). Under that statute, the prosecutor at arraignment must declare whether a misdemeanor charge will be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or as a violation. If the declaration is not made, the case must proceed as a violation. State v. Bonnin, 144 Or App 263, 926 P2d 830 (1996).
We do…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. LovetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. BonninCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. BelzonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004