Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 26, 2013No. 10P3245; A147752PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

This case requires us to determine whether the trial court had the authority to issue an amended judgment requiring defendant to pay an additional amount of restitution to a crime victim several months after the original entry of judgment on defendant’s criminal conviction. Defendant entered a guilty plea to one count of failing to perform the duties of a driver; pursuant to that plea, a judgment was entered requiring him to pay restitution to the victim, the City of Monmouth. Several months later, the victim filed a claim asserting that its constitutional rights had been violated when the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. BarrettOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. BarboeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. OrcuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. CastilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API