Legal Opinion

State v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 1990No. C89-01-30399, C89-01-30509, C89-01-30409, C89-01-30511 CA A62574 (Control), CA A62575, CA A62828, CA A62829PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*584WARREN, P. J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to nine crimes. On July 18, 1989, the trial court orally sentenced defendant to four concurrent indeterminate terms, not to exceed ten years. At the state’s request, the court delayed entering a final judgment until after defendant had taken a polygraph examination. He was then transferred to Oregon State Penitentiary. Transport orders included his maximum term but no mention of a minimum term. The parties dispute whether the judge’s oral pronouncement included a minimum term.

Defendant moved for clarification of the sentence. Because he still had not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. BlaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. BelzonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API