Legal Opinion
Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 30, 1999No. 96-237 LPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, Cane Tennessee, Inc. (“Cane”) and Colten, Inc. (“Colten”) own property in Bledsoe County, Tennessee. In their Complaint, plaintiffs assert a right to just compensation for a taking of their mineral interests and other property as a result of the government’s refusal to grant mining permits to Cane’s lessee, Eastern Minerals International, Inc. (“Eastern Minerals”) and Colten’s lessee, Van Burén Minerals Corporation (“Van Burén”). In its Motion for Summary Judgment,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Cygnus Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.