Legal Opinion
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 30, 1982No. 81-244PublishedCited by 1,517 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
This case presents the question whether a minor but permanent physical occupation of an owner’s property authorized by government constitutes a “taking” of property for which just compensation is due under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. New York law provides that a landlord must permit a cable television company to install its cable facilities upon his property. N. Y. Exec. Law §828(1) (McKinney Supp. 1981-1982). In this case, the cable installation occupied portions of appellant’s roof and the side of her building. The New York Court of Appeals ruled that this…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,517 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
1,512 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.