Legal Opinion
Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 29, 2004No. Nos. 96-237 L, 00-513 L, 02-945 LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Decision of May 28, 2004 (Def.’s Recons. Mot.).1 Pursu-ant to Rule 59 of the Court of Federal Claims, defendant seeks reconsideration of the court’s determination: (1) “that the relevant parcel as a whole for the Wyatt [plaint*705iffs]2 should exclude their oil and gas interests in the subject property” and (2) that the Wyatt plaintiffs’ “reasonable investment-backed expectations are not a factor in determining liability for a [categorical] regulatory taking of the Wyatts’ property.” Def.’s Recons. Mot.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.