Legal Opinion
Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 27, 2003No. 96-237 LPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claims of Plaintiffs Cane and Colten (Def.’s MSJ or defendant’s Motion) and plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion by Cane and Motion by the Wyatts and the Wyatt Trusts for Partial Summary Judgment that the Main Tract and the Rainey Ridge Tract Constitute Different “Parcels” and are the Only Parcels Relevant to their Claims (Pis.’ Cross-Motion or plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion). Cane Tennessee, Inc. (Cane) and Colten, Inc. (Colten) own property in Bledsoe County, Tennessee. The property was previously owned by the Wyatts…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Leon County v. GluesenkampDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.