Legal Opinion
Cygnus Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 3, 2004No. 01-699CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This contact case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), along with plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Cygnus Corporation, Inc. (“Cygnus”), alleges that the government is liable for breach of a contract under which Cygnus’s predecessor in interest, Herner & Company (“Herner”), provided the Office of Alternative Medicine (“OAM”) of the National Institutes of Health1 with two separate services relating to information technology.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Lankster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Katzin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Cygnus Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Council of Athabascan Tribal Governments v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.