Legal Opinion
Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 2, 2002No. 96-237LPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Respecting the Timing and Scope of Temporary and Permanent Takings of Plaintiffs’ Coal Estates and Respecting the “Denominator” Applied to the Takings Analysis (Pis.’ Mot.) and Defendant’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Def.’s Mot.). Plaintiffs, Cane Tennessee, Inc. (Cane) and Colten, Inc. (Colten) own property in Bledsoe County, Tennessee. In their Complaint,1 plaintiffs assert a right to just compensation for a taking of their mineral interests and other property as a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Breneman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Arctic King Fisheries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Cane Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.