Legal Opinion

People v. La MacChia

California Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1953No. S. F. 18835PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

For the purpose of constructing a freeway, the state is condemning certain land bordering the presently existing highway, which is to be widened. Along each side of the freeway there will be a fence cutting off access to it except through 20-foot openings at certain points.

*743There are five parcels of land involved in the state’s appeal from the judgment awarding damages to the owners. These parcels have a frontage on the present highway of from 260 to 5,000 feet. On the land having the 5,000-foot frontage, there are to be three 20-foot openings in the fence at convenient points. One 20-foot…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API