Legal Opinion

Reese v. Cradit

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 11, 1970No. 2 CA-CIV 700PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The appellees, Paul and Janet Cradit, filed a lawsuit against Mr. and Mrs. Julius S. Kleinman, Mr. and Mrs. Sidney Katz, and Mr. and Mrs. Ferdinand Reese, as the aftermath of an attempted land exchange with Ferdinand and Dorothy Reese. After the suit was instituted the defendant Ferdinand Reese died, his wife Dorothy qualified as executrix of his estate and was substituted in the lawsuit. No creditor’s claim was filed against the estate by the plaintiffs. After a jury trial, a plaintiff’s verdict was returned. This appeal is from the judgment entered on that verdict and from…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ruth v. RhodesArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Morriss v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Granone v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. SweatAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Nimetz v. CappadonaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & HandicappedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API