Legal Opinion
Seeger v. Odell
California Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1941No. L. A. 17462PublishedCited by 190 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants A. J. Odell, Mary Gibbs, William G. McAdoo and R. T. Colter. The allegations of the complaint must therefore be considered true as though the complaint were before the court upon a general demurrer. (Miller v. Price, 103 Cal. App. 650, 654 [284 Pac. 1035].)
The complaint alleges: The plaintiffs, an elderly couple, were the owners of a lot located in Huntington Beach, California. In 1926 they executed a note and mortgage on this lot to William G. McAdoo and R. T. Colter as security for the payment of a loan of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crompton v. BeedleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
- Chamberlin v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
- Robins v. HopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Glickman v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Wilson v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Miller v. Yokohama Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.